How many User Acceptance Test Cases need to be prepared for an application?

Browse » Home » » How many User Acceptance Test Cases need to be prepared for an application?

Feb 7, 2009

How many User Acceptance Test Cases need to be prepared for an application?

Subscribe the QA and Software Testing Newsletter

Post Your Queries | QA and Testing - Table of Contents

Comments :

2 comments to “How many User Acceptance Test Cases need to be prepared for an application?”

No its incorrect. Here is the rule :

Tota Test Cases = (FP)raise to 1.2

Acceptance Test Cases = 1.2(FP)
isha said...: Nov 12, 2009 9:59:00 PM; Its Incorrect.

Rule is :-

Total Test Cases - (FPC)to power 1.2

Acceptance Test Cases = 1.2(FPC)
isha said...: Nov 12, 2009 10:00:00 PM

Energize your test team

You're waist deep in your third month of late nights, weekends, and shipping stress; you can see and feel your team's energy waning.

The Value of Positive Testing

There is a school of thought in software testing that debunks the value of positive testing. This school basically states that any test that does not produce a defect is not a good test.

Impact Analysis Checklist for Req. Changes
___ Implications of the Proposed Change* Identify any existing requirements in the baseline that

The Process of Test Process Improvement

Software testing is still a pain-in-the-neck for many organizations. Because it is only marginally addressed in software process improvement models like CMMi

Software Defect-bug Management Philosphy

Imperfect processes cause most of the software defects. Thus to prevent defects, the development process needs to be overhauled.

Software testing Metrices-Test Case Review

Metrics are the means by which the software quality can be measured; they give you confidence in the product.

Energize your test team

You're waist deep in your third month of late nights, weekends, and shipping stress; you can see and feel your team's energy waning.

The Value of Positive Testing

There is a school of thought in software testing that debunks the value of positive testing. This school basically states that any test that does not produce a defect is not a good test.